| 16 July 2008 |
This media statement is listed on behalf of the National Native Title Council of which the GLSC is a member
Four-point plan for making native title system work better |
The
NNTC wants the native title process overhauled to give Aboriginal people a
better chance of having connection to their traditional lands recognised,
thereby achieving stronger protection of their law and customs and quicker
attainment of economic independence.
“The
spirit of the initial Mabo decision has been lost in a tangled web of legalese,
with all its attendant costs and delays,” said NNTC Chairperson Brian Wyatt.
In
a submission to the Federal Government’s review of native title the NTTC
welcomed the new directions already outlined by the Attorney General and
Minister for Indigenous Affairs and identified four policy priorities for making
the system work better:
1.
A National Policy Framework for settling native title
by agreement
2.
Improving native title processes and outcomes;
3.
Maximising economic outcomes from native title
agreements; and
4.
Acknowledgement of the changed role of Native Title
Representative Bodies (NTRBs) and Native Title Service providers (NTSs) and
better resourcing.
“A
framework that gives all parties the incentive to accept negotiation of claims
as best practice, not litigation, is urgently required if delays and costs are
to be significantly reduced.
“The
existence of Section 223 of the Native Title Act must be reviewed. As it is, it
is discriminatory, setting an unprecedented onus of proof on Aboriginal people
with regard to connection to their traditional lands.
“People
are often required to provide the courts with the impossible – written
evidence of pre-settlement connection when there were no records kept. Judges
must also be allowed to accept the testimony of Aboriginal witnesses as factual
evidence.
“The
Commonwealth must take the lead in establishing the new policy framework and
delivery of change on the ground.
“There
were significant differences between what ministers in the previous government
said and what Commonwealth legal counsel in native title negotiation and
mediation proceedings did. Everyone would benefit from the actions of the
Commonwealth’s legal counsel mirroring the conciliatory tone of the new
Federal Government.
“We
propose that the NNTC and Commonwealth and State/Territory governments work
closely together to expedite the processing of individual claims by identifying
and overcoming blockages.”
“Native
title bodies remain the major work horses in the current system and the
Government’s only viable conduit to the people for whom the Native Title Act
was primarily established. The views and experience of these bodies have thus
far been undervalued by the Commonwealth.”
The
NNTC wants the changed role of NTRBs and NTSs acknowledged with matching
funding.
“We
concur with assessments by both the Government and industry that the resourcing
of the native title bodies is a mismatch with their responsibilities.
“The
bodies’ funding crisis has forced brutal prioritisation of their work, causing
legitimate dissatisfaction from claimants, courts and respondents about the
limited number of claims that are being progressed.”
While
resources have been diminishing, NTRBs/NTSs’ responsibilities have been
steadily increasing to include such things as heritage management and
conservation; taxation, trusts and corporate design, and the management and
distribution of benefits; and program development.
The NTTC noted Government concerns regarding
management of native title benefits but insists that the principles underlying
national laws and international covenants, such as the UN Declaration on the
Rights of Indigenous Peoples, are adhered to.
“It
is imperative that native title holders’ ability to take responsibility for
themselves and to make decisions that affect their own lives be enhanced and
maintained, not diminished,” Mr Wyatt said.
A
copy of the NNTC submission to the Commonwealth is attached.
Media contact: Brian Wyatt 0417 970413; David Berry 0417 963089